beschizza at June 26th, 2014 10:37 — #1
old at June 26th, 2014 10:51 — #2
euansmith at June 26th, 2014 11:17 — #3
wearysky at June 26th, 2014 11:17 — #4
10 is far too round of a number. It needs to be 9, or 11, or 17.
mcsnee at June 26th, 2014 11:24 — #5
I love the neat, orderly rows on the German beach.
pixleshifter at June 26th, 2014 12:10 — #6
"The world is not overcrowded".
Umm, yes it is.
dfaris at June 26th, 2014 12:31 — #7
Hooray! Buzzfeed Listicles on Boing Boing!
chickied at June 26th, 2014 12:39 — #8
I was curious about the Lloyd's of London's Remembrance Day event and found a good article here with more photos, including this one which is ever more boggling.
aikimo at June 26th, 2014 13:40 — #9
Unlike, say, man-made global warming, there is much disagreement on this. There are places that don't have access to necessary resources and too high a concentration of people, but it doesn't follow necessarily that the planet is overpopulated. Along with decreasing rates of poverty and hunger, birthrates in the most populated places are falling dramatically. The UN estimates now that world population will start falling in 2075 when it peaks at just over 9 billion.
mister44 at June 26th, 2014 14:06 — #10
Certain areas are, but overall we have lots of room and resources for more people.
euansmith at June 26th, 2014 14:07 — #11
spatley at June 26th, 2014 14:29 — #12
brainspore at June 26th, 2014 14:53 — #13
That's true, the number of people the planet can support varies widely depending on factors like lifestyle. Are we talking about 7 billion people who all own SUVs and eat steak every day or 7 billion vegans who live together in low-impact communes?
aikimo at June 26th, 2014 15:38 — #14
Seeing as how most people find both of those lifestyles very unattractive, I don't think it's going to be an issue.
samsam at June 26th, 2014 15:39 — #15
7 billion who all drive SUVs powered by photosynthetic algae biofuels, eat steaks made from stem-cells, cricket powder and (more) algae, and have near-infinite power due to fusion reactors coming online.
Ha, eat that! WoooOOOooo technoutopia!!!!!1 Let's not worry about the present because scientists will save us!
samwinston at June 26th, 2014 16:11 — #16
I'd feel very uncomfortable in a modern building with that type of crowd density. Did the designers take into account 'every square in full of people'; and most importantly did the contractors stick to the plans?
Sometimes that many people can cause unexpected stress on structures.
Especially if they start walking in unison...or just watching a dance competition as in the collapse of the sky bridge in the Hyatt in Kansas City.
chickied at June 26th, 2014 16:22 — #17
I agree. Not sure that's a place I'd want to be. Cool picture though.
mister44 at June 26th, 2014 16:26 — #18
That accident wasn't due to unexpected stress. It's not that too many people exceeded its design perimeters. It was from changes in the design done in mid-construction that never met the original design specs.
I am sure such buildings as those above were designed to handle a crowd that large. Now, whether there was a screw up during construction that compromised the strength of the structure isn't really obvious until it fails. But that happens so rarely I wouldn't worry about it. You're more likely to get killed in a crosswalk at the mall.
strangefriendbb at June 26th, 2014 17:00 — #19
How about this crowd? (A Spencer Tunick shoot in Munich.)
thekaz at June 26th, 2014 18:09 — #20
Is that Martin Prince's pool..?
next page →