doctorow at June 18th, 2014 12:01 — #1
wrecksdart at June 18th, 2014 12:32 — #2
Let start off by saying that this is not my attempt to "Benghazi" the stingray controversy, but I'm curious where the seizure order originated.
kenmce at June 18th, 2014 12:41 — #3
I'm curious where the seizure order originated.
That's a confidential security matter, citizen. Now go about your business. Oh, and keep a cellphone on your person while you do, in case we need anything.
davide405 at June 18th, 2014 13:37 — #4
Cable Company f*ckery, meet National Security f*ckery.
robotmonkeys at June 18th, 2014 13:46 — #5
Now if only an ACLU case against the FBI would get the same documents ceased by a state's police force.
I played this game as a kid at school. It sucked.
peacelove at June 18th, 2014 13:56 — #6
Boy, if they're trying to convince people the U.S. is not a police state they're doing a lousy job.
laynesk at June 18th, 2014 14:05 — #7
Even when/if the Courts side with the ACLU, it's not like the administration gives a damn.
"State's rights"...who cares about that quaint old notion?
It's nice to see the President so, so worried about the degradation of law & order in Iraq. But maybe he could start paying some attention to the same problem in this country?
melted_crayons at June 18th, 2014 17:18 — #8
Do not disturb the fabric of the Matrix.
shaddack at June 18th, 2014 21:24 — #9
Stingray is only one of the IMSI-catcher devices. These things perform man-in-the-middle on the phone-to-network connection. (And I created this article back in 2005. So the thing is nothing new, and wasn't really new even then.)
hereticbranding at June 19th, 2014 01:48 — #10
Yeah. The nothing to hide argument only applies to us citizens.
doctorow at June 23rd, 2014 12:01 — #11
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.