beschizza at June 25th, 2014 19:09 — #1
cintune at June 25th, 2014 19:24 — #2
Well, that's kind of sad, seeing as the so-called "original" is essentially a copy of ancient Celtic designs in the first place.
skeptic at June 25th, 2014 19:35 — #3
Yeah, they are both torques. I'm not impressed by the copying claim. It may be a copy, but it isn't an exact copy. Meh.
I'm against unsavory blatant and opportunistic corporate plagiarism, but this case, not so much.
lylehopwood at June 25th, 2014 20:01 — #4
Chiming in to agree that they're just torcs. I have half a dozen with different twists and caps dating back to about 1970, so if these were copyrightable, some hippy is in for an unexpected payday.
ctg at June 25th, 2014 20:37 — #5
Would now be the time to bring up a clip once posted on this site?
gellfex at June 25th, 2014 20:46 — #6
If that were the copying threshold the whole fashion industry would be mass of lawsuits. Usually it's far more blatant and everyone just shrugs. A friend had a small design business and got a locally made bag of hers into a very high end NYC dept store. The next year she got no new order and saw they had a chinese made knockoff on sale. Rinse and repeat and THATS the fashion industry.
On the other hand maybe the guy should be fired simply for not being very original, if that's what he's being paid for.
mister44 at June 25th, 2014 22:06 — #7
Sounds like they made a really, really lame excuse to fire a guy for whatever other reasons.
Neither designs are unique or original. I've seen Celt, Greek, and Roman bracelets that were basically the same design.
nezrite at June 25th, 2014 23:08 — #8
Plus, I think the "knockoff" (which clearly is just a torque) is more elegant and attractive.
digitalartform at June 26th, 2014 03:21 — #9
Very interesting. I wish she had addressed fonts in her presentation.
jonbly at June 26th, 2014 04:52 — #10
That's the closest comparable item they could find? Seriously?
fuzzyfungus at June 26th, 2014 06:34 — #11
He should feel lucky that the Woad Lawyers are apparently busy with more pressing matters. They can be pretty nasty.
moddycurl at June 26th, 2014 08:46 — #12
My understanding is that fashion and recipes are two areas that cannot be copyrighted. Both areas flourish because people build upon the works of others.
wearysky at June 26th, 2014 09:01 — #13
Wow, that is some bullshit right there. They're both gold coloured twisted cable torque bracelets, sure, but this is hardly an original idea. And they're not even that similar, to begin with.
miker at June 26th, 2014 13:02 — #14
Hold on, didn't Armani go through the usual ritual of offering one or more of 'it's a common trend at the moment', 'a tribute to a great artist' or just 'two people independently stumbled on similar designs' excuses that we expect from major retailers who copy other peoples' works?
jorpho at June 26th, 2014 14:24 — #15
First thing I thought of was the Q-Ray bracelet. Now there's some folks who ought to be sued into oblivion.
ryuthrowsstuff at June 27th, 2014 03:05 — #16
Torcs predate the Celts. I'd heard something about their origin being in Iran or the fertile crescent area. But a stiff necklace or bracelet made from twisted rods/wires/bands of metal with defined terminals is pretty much one of oldest concepts in jewelry.
retepslluerb at June 27th, 2014 03:22 — #17
beschizza at June 30th, 2014 19:09 — #18
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.