beschizza at January 7th, 2014 11:14 — #1
myopichumanist at January 7th, 2014 12:01 — #2
Going? Shouldn't it be past tense?
anthonyc at January 7th, 2014 12:18 — #3
I object to the idea that Slender Man is the first open-source monster. Wouldn't essentially all traditional monsters fall into that category? Trolls, ogres, vampires, succubi, strangers poisoning Halloween candy?
tobinl at January 7th, 2014 12:52 — #4
I originally parsed that as horror shaped noodles. Cthulu noodles, it's whats for dinner!
blindwanderer at January 7th, 2014 16:31 — #5
This article inspired me to turn the ghost story I wrote meta (it will probably be a few months before it's done).
catvincent at January 8th, 2014 18:15 — #6
I'm the guy quoted in the article who made the remark about Slenderman as 'the first open-source monster'. I take your point to a degree re. other folk creatures, but the 2 aspects which make Slendy's origin unique and worth describing as such comes down to two factors:
Unlike the other folk monsters, Slendy's creation was a conscious, collaborative, networked process which anyone who wished to could join in - pretty much the definition of open-source as an approach. (A part of Will's interview with me covered how the forums which gently police the canon for each 'pasta bears a striking similarity to the kind of "cocktail party rules" Hakim Bey uses to describe the internal decision-making structures of Temporary Autonomous Zones.That's a very open-source solution to the problem.)
Secondly, it was the first one created after the term was coined! (Though I see that as a minor aspect, honestly.)
Thanks for commenting.
anthonyc at January 8th, 2014 18:57 — #7
Thanks for clearing that up! Makes sense.
beschizza at January 12th, 2014 11:14 — #8
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.