doctorow at January 11th, 2014 13:00 — #1
jeremy_sweeney at January 11th, 2014 13:13 — #2
Filming people without their knowledge! Clearly the right approach to dating. This is awful.
david_robles at January 11th, 2014 13:39 — #3
This is disgusting on many levels. Secretly streaming your romantic encounters? If you wouldn't film a date if you went home with him, you shouldn't do it at a restaurant either. This is a terrible invasion of privacy. She's engaging with these men under the pretense of getting to know each other, when it's really about the internet getting to know the guy. Her comments on how hollow this is makes it clear that this is horrific, and on some level she knows it.
wafermouse at January 11th, 2014 13:41 — #4
So, one eye on the phone at all times is the best way to behave on a date?
charles_richter at January 11th, 2014 14:36 — #5
Advice on optimal date behavior: stop doing this.
Although the concept, divorced of its human element, is interesting. Basically the same deal that Neal Stephenson described in Interface, except without biofeedback from the focus group.
joey_bladb at January 11th, 2014 14:36 — #6
It's a great idea jotted on a napkin during an amphetamine fueled brain storming meeting with your study group -- reduce human interaction to a crowdsourced work unit, take measurements, mirthful results will ensue! it's a jaunty and bold intro-psych / computer science / BDSM / performance art thesis project, and would give you just the name-brand recognition you need when applying for grad school.
But typically there's some kind of academic oversight which would be quick to point out the ethical and possibly legal flaws and offer strong discouragement.
mthead at January 11th, 2014 14:49 — #7
Is it too much to ask that people learn the difference between "discreet" and "discrete"?
I suppose, however, that what she describes really doesn't meet any reasonable definition of "discretion", so maybe she used the right word after all.
madlogician at January 11th, 2014 14:50 — #8
ssimmons0602 at January 11th, 2014 14:53 — #9
- Discrete does not mean the same thing as discreet.
- Filming a date without his/her permission? Lady, you are WAY out of line. Shame on you.
jeremy_sweeney at January 11th, 2014 15:06 — #10
None of this would pass the NIH Human Subjects Use guidelines.
phasmafelis at January 11th, 2014 17:56 — #11
How the hell do you "discreetly" film your date?
Reminds me of the Monkees episode where they were trying to get the foreign spy to speak directly into the table lamp with the hidden microphone.
newliminted at January 11th, 2014 18:07 — #12
Who is the subject of the experiment? I think she is. The date is a prop.
chgoliz at January 11th, 2014 20:32 — #13
Life....you're doing it wrong.
brwellstx at January 11th, 2014 23:37 — #14
I think I may know why she is having trouble finding someone to settle down with.
ahmed_sayid at January 12th, 2014 04:12 — #15
the blonde with the red scarf behind them, I would date her
actionabe at January 12th, 2014 09:03 — #16
This just furthers my belief that a lot of people on OKCupid are creeps.
wrecksdart at January 12th, 2014 13:41 — #17
It's also one of the great opportunities for a datebomb ala photobomb (and I guess I mean that in at least two ways) by her fellow datee.
pgt at January 12th, 2014 13:46 — #18
Reminds me of this:
'Sight': Man with Augmented Reality intelligent implants uses 'Wingman' app to seduce girl.
Hilarity does NOT ensue.
tornpapernapkin at January 12th, 2014 17:54 — #19
doctorow at January 16th, 2014 13:00 — #20
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.