doctorow at April 21st, 2014 10:19 — #1
walt_buchanan at April 21st, 2014 10:24 — #2
I think it's a monkey of some kind.
chentzilla at April 21st, 2014 10:33 — #3
vadym_zakrevsky at April 21st, 2014 10:40 — #4
peteykins at April 21st, 2014 10:43 — #5
Scale would be helpful. I'm thinking squirrel.
ulysses at April 21st, 2014 10:45 — #6
othermichael at April 21st, 2014 10:46 — #7
non-petrified cardiff giant (juvenile)
eliotfur at April 21st, 2014 10:50 — #8
Probably, a cat... I've noticed some typical teeth there...
It is definitely a mammal...
seabird_mckeon at April 21st, 2014 10:52 — #9
It's a house cat. The teeth and feet give it away.
acerplatanoides at April 21st, 2014 10:53 — #10
tapir123 at April 21st, 2014 10:58 — #11
Skeletal anatomy clearly identifies this as a cat - no mystery; skull, teeth, claws, feet, hair on feet, shoulder blades, ah heck, all of it says cat. Not looking it's best that's for sure.
tornpapernapkin at April 21st, 2014 10:59 — #12
Not mysterious but it makes me sad. Looks like a cat to me. Poor thing.
jardine at April 21st, 2014 11:06 — #13
spunkytws at April 21st, 2014 11:07 — #14
Am I the only one who's read Singularity by William Sleator? Check the area for signs of a very localized temporal disturbance.
sebwiers at April 21st, 2014 11:11 — #15
Cat, but I'm surprised the bones are all in one place. Whenever I come across them, they are usually scattered over many square feet. The teeth can be really tricky to find. (I sometimes take the skulls home, clean and articulate them,)
miasm at April 21st, 2014 11:12 — #16
I know this one. It's a puzzle from 'The Dig'
It looks kinda like a turtle.
josiahwhite at April 21st, 2014 11:13 — #17
I don't think we can rule out human remains. It could very well be the bones of a white blond haired blue eyed kidnapped little girl. Get Nancy Grace on the horn. I suppose she could use another one of these stories.
kpkpkp at April 21st, 2014 11:19 — #18
This is not a wonderful thing.
charleston_chu at April 21st, 2014 11:41 — #19
milliefink at April 21st, 2014 11:44 — #20
I think the world will be a better place when (and if) we can treat such graphic imagery of freshly killed animals like we would those of freshly killed humans. I think it's wrong that one is considered worse than the other, and usually forbidden, or marked NSFW or "disturbing." We're animals too. The sooner we accept that and extend the respect we pay to human animals to other ones too, the better off we'll all be.
next page →