First they have to take away all the guns, then they can DO THIS.
1 Like
howâs a treaty requiring handing over privacy records going to fly given CJEU?
1 Like
No, they havenât.
This is just one battle within an on-going class war.
Weâre still very much fighting with the ever-growing and most massive, dynamic grassroots movement weâve ever seen in the history of our nation against these piles of corporatist shit.
6 Likes
Isnât this very much a double-edged sword? Signatories could stop trials involving malfeasance by their own corporations, but a do-gooder country could put a stop to trials of, say, persecuted whistleblowers and fall guys.
Really? How is this clickbait? Iâm really interested in what youâre saying.
Shadowrun?
3 Likes
They want to give us George Orwell.
If weâll work hard enough, we can turn it into William Gibson.
4 Likes
you'll notice that all of the provisions that recognize the rights of the public are non-binding, whereas almost everything that benefits rightsholders is bindingThe part of EFF's analysis I "liked" best.
1 Like
what if we just shot all the execs of media and telecom companies? and then just keep going until no one wants to wave that flag any more.
3 Likes
Yeah, well, Neuromancer is hardly a cheerful milieu Plus, no-one invented cellphones there 
.
3 Likes
âBâ Ark taken to its logical conclusion.
2 Likes
But donât forget to let the telephone sanitisers stay.
3 Likes
Everybody has their own cellphone these days. Are said sanitizers still necessary?
Understandable. Tempting even. But when talking potential mass extinction youâd really really have to have it in for 'em.
3 Likes
Of course they donât. The only way the gun people will get involved is if they threaten that right itself. Otherwise, theyâll happily sit it out just like every other civil rights violation theyâve ignored.
2 Likes
You forgot to include âwake up sheepleâ in your rant.
3 Likes
At this point, I assume Cory made this up as clickbait.
I donât recall being asked
Deference to authority
