#1 By: Cory Doctorow, September 11th, 2013 01:46
#2 By: bolamig, September 11th, 2013 02:18
This will probably be the legacy of Snowden: By revealing most everything, he eliminated the "we'd like to debate it openly but we can't reveal anything" excuse that has stifled any debate. The debate is on.
#3 By: Cowicide, September 11th, 2013 02:37
Snowden will be in the history books and he'll be very much on the right side of history. To all those who maligned him, they'll be an embarrassment to their future generations of children who'll read about the doltish detractors who were too docile, uninformed, evil and/or dense to understand he was an American patriot.
I wouldn't be proud of my grandfather if he was on the wrong side of history in American civil rights. This is very similar.
All of you that denounced Snowden and called him a traitor, your legacy will be shit. Might as well retire your family name, because it'll just be an embarrassment for future generations.
If you've supported Snowden, then please pat yourself on the back. You helped to do good for this world.
And... on that note, it's time to give the EFF the support they need to fight for you.
#5 By: Pat Race, September 11th, 2013 03:21
Thanks @doctorow and thanks EFF.
#6 By: William_Holz, September 11th, 2013 03:25
Well, we're certainly starting to see the reasons for the government's 'Don't listen to this Snowden guy' propaganda attack, eh?
#7 By: The Mudshark, September 11th, 2013 04:34
"accidental violations of the law"
#8 By: Jewels Vern, September 11th, 2013 05:18
So who goes to jail for this crime?
#9 By: MikeKStar, September 11th, 2013 05:40
Pretty much confirms the idea that sunlight is the best disinfectant. This secrecy bullshit has gone on long enough.
#10 By: IMB, September 11th, 2013 06:17
Yeah, does that work when you go 85 MPH on the freeway? You could be accelerating to avoid a dangerous driver and not realize you have increased speed to that degree. No, that excuse doesn't work.
#11 By: GideonTJones, September 11th, 2013 07:13
Most of what people are attributing to Snowden was revealed years ago. And much of the rest is the result of lawsuits that have been in the works for years. Snowden's responsible for much of the mainstream media waking up. And since that's pretty much all congress pays attention to, that's obviously good.
#12 By: IMB, September 11th, 2013 07:23
I don't think that is entirely true. With Snowden's release, The ACLU had proof in order to file a lawsuit. Having suspicions without basis will get you nowhere fast and your case tossed out.
#13 By: GideonTJones, September 11th, 2013 07:28
If I criticize how the NAACP handled the Claudette Colvin case, does that mean I'm on the wrong side of history? Sometimes, people on the right side do screwed up things. Sometimes while trying to help. You should be able to point that out without being told you're on the "wrong side".
#14 By: GideonTJones, September 11th, 2013 07:35
This lawsuit was filed by the EFF a couple years ago.
And you don't need proof of something to request a release of info under FOIA, that would totally defeat the purpose.
#15 By: IMB, September 11th, 2013 07:39
The ACLU's 2008 lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the FISA Amendments Act, which authorized the so-called "warrantless wiretapping program," was dismissed 5–4 by the Supreme Court in February on the grounds that the plaintiffs could not prove that they had been monitored. ACLU attorneys working on today's complaint said they do not expect the issue of standing to be a problem in this case because of the FISA Court order revealed last week.
#16 By: Cowicide, September 11th, 2013 07:54
If I criticize how the NAACP handled the Claudette Colvin case, does that mean I'm on the wrong side of history?
This is about NSA spying and Snowden. Go start another thread if you want to discuss a different issue. You're off-topic and irrelevant.
#17 By: Cowicide, September 11th, 2013 08:16
Most of what people are attributing to Snowden was revealed years ago.
"Don't savvy me." New shorthand: only 14 characters. It means: Stop dismissing valid questions with the insider's, "and this surprises you?"
Snowden's responsible for much of the mainstream media waking up
He's responsible for more than that for christ's sake. Why minimize what he's done?
Thanks to Snowden, we now know the NSA:
• Had James Clapper lie under oath to us - on camera - to Congress to hide the domestic spying programs Occured in March, revealed in June.
• Warrantlessly accesses records of every phone call that routes through the US thousands of times a day June September
• Steals your private data from every major web company (Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, et al) via PRISMJune and pays them millions for it August
• Pays major US telecommunications providers (AT&T, Verizon, et al) between $278,000,000-$394,000,000 annually to provide secret access to all US fiber and cellular networks (in violation of the 4th amendment). August
• Intentionally weakened the encryption standards we rely on, put backdoors into critical software, and break the crypto on our private communications September
• NSA employees use these powers to spy on their US citizen lovers via LOVEINT, and only get caught if they self-confess. Though this is a felony, none were ever been charged with a crime. August
• Lied to us again just ten days ago, claiming they never perform economic espionage (whoops!) before a new leak revealed that they do all the time. September
• Made over fifteen thousand false certifications to the secret FISA court, leading a judge to rule they "frequently and systemically violated" court orders in a manner "directly contrary to the sworn attestations of several executive branch officials," that 90% of their searches were unlawful, and that they "repeatedly misled the court." September September
• Has programs that collect data on US Supreme Court Justices and elected officials, and they secretly provide it to Israel regulated only by an honor system. September
source for list and sources
#18 By: fuzzyfuzzyfungus, September 11th, 2013 08:22
Why, the underlings were just following orders, so we can't go after them; but we can't hold the leadership responsible for a few bad apples acting in excess of their authority... Just another instance of Schrodinger's misconduct, nothing to see here.
#19 By: GideonTJones, September 11th, 2013 08:24
You brought up the Civil Rights Movement, not me. And I'll say again- one can criticize Snowden's approach and not be on the NSA's "side", just as one could criticize individual Civil Right's figures approaches and not be pro-segregation.
#20 By: GideonTJones, September 11th, 2013 08:33
The initial leak and the stories about it were info we already knew about (and in many cases, had ongoing lawsuits over). And I'm far from one of Rosen's insiders. Anyone who reads the paper or Boing Boing, or belongs to the EFF and ACLU knew about this stuff.
And I don't think a lot of what 's been leaked since is stuff that should have been leaked.
#21 By: bbarnezz, September 11th, 2013 08:41
Sorry, but I can't agree. We might have suspected, but the stonewalling under the guise of "protecting national security secrets" prevented further review. This is the entire value of an insider turning whistleblower. It eliminates the ability to obscure, to stall, to obfuscate with semantic trickery.
If you remember, the administration even blocked the viewing of the legal interpretations that they were using to justify much of this activity. When you can't even see the wording of their lawyers, it is impossible to know how far they are stretching the usage, or to challenge it.
next page →