beschizza at September 4th, 2013 14:12 — #1
alexweberis at September 4th, 2013 14:23 — #2
I, for one, am very happy with my choice of the Pebble smartwatch. e-ink display gets ~5 days on a full charge!
jandrese at September 4th, 2013 14:25 — #3
10 hours of battery is a deal killer, but it is something they might be able to address in version 2 with a more efficient chip and maybe smarter power management and probably a bit higher capacity battery. \
Of course if this does take off I can't wait for the inevitable screen size arms race from the various manufacturers, just like in the Android smartphone market. In 4 or 5 years we'll be able to buy a watch the size of an old iPhone because screen size is king, and then people will hack them into regular phones because Android phones will be too big to fit in their pocket anymore.
nathanrudy at September 4th, 2013 14:34 — #4
I bought the Galaxy SIII when it was still the top of the line for Samsung, and am peeved at them for not being able to upgrade the phone to the newest Android software ... maybe ever. Yes, I could root. Yes I could do this fix. Yes I could do that fix, but for goodness sake I shouldn't have to when I am paying hundreds of dollars plus locked into a contract.
I gotta say, I am not an Apple fan, but I'm considering the switch.
go_robot_go at September 4th, 2013 15:39 — #5
Agreed. I find that if I shut the Pebble down at night while I'm sleeping, I can often eke out a full week or more on a single charge.
normal at September 4th, 2013 16:51 — #6
Where are you getting the 10 hour number from? The only thing listed in the article was "about a day" and that the batteries were running down by the time the demo was over, which can probably be attributed to higher than typical use of camera and screen.
I think the thing is going to flop but no need to start making up numbers to speed it on it's way.
alexweberis at September 4th, 2013 19:21 — #7
totally going to start doing that... good tip
alexweberis at September 4th, 2013 19:22 — #8
I'm fascinated by this idea! Would be rad to have a cuff-shaped touchscreen device in the future.
pjcamp at September 4th, 2013 22:31 — #9
Y'all gonna look real uptown with a $300 doorknob on your wrist.
You've already got a clock in your phone and the world is full of other clocks. Wristwatches are just an excuse to wear bracelets.
steve_nordquist at September 4th, 2013 23:08 — #10
Yes, bluetooth headset pairing under 70M of saltwater, zippy inertial 3D GPS response for cavern divers, and a suite of confined space apps or the price will quickly fall under the more adaptable e-paper watch's $50.
Or, as you may suggest, move to paired detached cuffs, standalone gothic bowed collar and animal ears (because aren't the good doorknobs $300 MSRP anyhow?)
How do you shut the Pebble off while you are sleeping? Like, on the second nodding chorus of 'Highway to Hell' you have some sort of cue-response with your wrist? [self-caffeination continues]
teapot at September 4th, 2013 23:27 — #11
Dumb. On iphone you wouldn't have any options to get it done. Plus just be patient man.. the Siii is getting an official update to 4.3 (which is what you need for this watch) in October:
cservant at September 5th, 2013 03:22 — #12
Ars report 315mAh battery. And "it's only compatible with Samsung smartphones that run Android 4.3. That's pretty crippling."
I'll stick to my Gshock watches which lasts for months without any recharge from it's solar cells. Or just a regular watch which lasts at least a year before you switch batteries. Thank you.
I bet the battery killer is Bluetooth, display and chip. Bluetooth is bloated. Don't know how much power the display and chip needs. I think this thing is overkill.
kimmo at September 5th, 2013 09:05 — #13
Do I have to be the one to tell everybody how to power a smartwatch?
Integrate the battery into the band (Li-ion cells are a thin film that's rolled up; should be feasible enough), with only a tiny back-up cell inside (if that's even necessary on something designed to pair with a phone).
For crying out loud, duh.
go_robot_go at September 5th, 2013 13:59 — #14
Awesome, let us know how your Kickstarter goes.
halloween_jack_ at September 5th, 2013 14:59 — #15
Ugh. Twice as much as the Pebble at retail, and like I need another camera in my life.
kimmo at September 5th, 2013 22:39 — #16
I'm a bike mechanic, not an electronic engineer.
And anyway, you're nuts if you think some backyarder can cut it against megacorps when it comes to miniaturised stuff.
go_robot_go at September 5th, 2013 22:56 — #17
Ah, sorry. Perhaps you can understand my confusion: you wrote with such confidence about the method and ease with which a smartwatch should be powered, I just naturally assumed that you were on the road to doing it yourself, rather than simply being one of those guys who are the technology world's equivalent of the armchair quarterback who spends his Monday evenings shouting baffled invective at those stupid running backs who would score a damn touchdown every now and then if they'd just listen to him and run faster, dammit.
kimmo at September 6th, 2013 10:59 — #18
If you're going to liken me to an armchair quarterback, perhaps you'd be so kind as to point out the obviously crucial flaw in my idea that renders it actually not a superior approach.
There's potentially more room in the band, and until a day or two's capacity at least is feasible, the main point of it is to allow hot-swapping another band/cell.
But I guess you'd probably rather play the man than address that, huh.
beschizza at September 9th, 2013 14:12 — #19
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.