xeni at July 3rd, 2013 11:54 — #1
Lost in the plane-chasing, Moscow-airport-limbo-ing dramatic Snowden headlines today is a bombshell revelation: America's most senior intelligence official lied to a Senate intelligence committee. Not that James Clapper is admitting he committed perjury by intentionally misleading our elected representatives. He claims instead that he gave an 'erroneous' answer because he forgot about the Patriot Act.… READ THE REST
peregrinus_bis at July 3rd, 2013 12:04 — #2
Applause to Mr Clapper.
He's just given me the most elegant response to anything I do wrong ever. "Sorry honey, I was thinking about a different kind of intercourse." That'd hold up in front of a divorce judge, right?
gendun at July 3rd, 2013 12:34 — #3
If we accept Clapper's response at face value - laughable, I know - then he's simply proving that our current oversight regime is fatally flawed, because covert programs of compelling public interest may go unreported to Congress if our National Intelligence Director happens to forget that they exist. Hardly a rousing defense of the status quo.
daemon23 at July 3rd, 2013 13:01 — #4
See, it's not that he's a liar, he's just grossly incompetant!
EDITED TO ADD: hm. Didn't mean this to be a reply, still learning the UI.
decoy131 at July 3rd, 2013 13:36 — #5
It's almost as if the timing of the leaks is intentional to allow for the government to admit they do x, but deny they do y, only to have the next leak force them to retract their claim that, "alright, we're doing y, but there's definitely no way we're doing z, no siree..." ...and so on and so forth.
It seems to be quite effective in enhancing the distrust both from the people and from foreign governments, which seemed to be Snowden's intent. I can't decide if he deserves credit for planning that, or if it's just coincidental.
dragonfrog at July 3rd, 2013 14:58 — #6
Oh, you meant sexual intercourse. Of course, I should have gotten that.
What I meant was, no, we aren't pen-pals.
lightningwaltz at July 3rd, 2013 17:06 — #7
Apparently ignorance of the law is a defence, for some.
fuzzyfungus at July 3rd, 2013 17:13 — #8
So, yeah, we are apparently doing enough covert stuff that our national intelligence chief just golly shucks can't keep it all straight. No problem, right?
noahdjango at July 3rd, 2013 18:55 — #9
reminds me of the Clinton "depends what your definition of 'is' is" defense and the Chapelle defense http://www.hark.com/clips/tpgydkhpbr-i-didnt-know-i-couldnt-do-that
pjcamp at July 4th, 2013 02:12 — #10
So lemme see if I've got this here.
The presence or absence of the Patriot Act can turn a lie off and on?
I had no clue lying was so epistemologically flexible.
peregrinus_bis at July 4th, 2013 05:22 — #11
I think he actually declared simple "ignorance"
thetorchpasses at July 4th, 2013 13:50 — #12
There's a certain beauty to the system of government that's spawned this whole thing. At best, most people don't care, and at worst, most people support it.
By the way did you guys hear the latest on Kim Kardashian?
thetorchpasses at July 4th, 2013 13:58 — #13
You or Clapper? : )
Clap on! Clap off! The Clapper!
xeni at July 8th, 2013 11:54 — #14
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.