doctorow at February 1st, 2014 03:08 — #1
derekchan at February 1st, 2014 03:27 — #2
Alas missed opportunity. No one dressed as a priest chanting "Get thee behind me, Snowden!".
ashen_victor at February 1st, 2014 04:24 — #3
Fucking insane, I just cant describe more precisely the mentality behind the whole Cameron reaction to Snowden.
jake0748 at February 1st, 2014 05:14 — #4
retepslluerb at February 1st, 2014 05:15 — #5
I really, really hate the various narratives, that this is about government officials being stupid and not understanding that destroying a computer won't affect the distributed copies.
This was a clear message: Stop doing what you are doing, or we will break you. Not just your stuff.
knoxblox at February 1st, 2014 05:29 — #6
Nope. Can't watch.
Am I wrong in feeling this is akin to book burning, or other burnings for that matter? Record albums, witches, etc.?
jpgsawyer at February 1st, 2014 05:59 — #7
Well given the Mr Cameron used TV dramas as justification for the Surveillance State this sort of witchcraft isn't really surprising.
What is it about Politicians that means they have so little grip on reality or logic.
sdfrost61 at February 1st, 2014 06:17 — #8
julian_bond1 at February 1st, 2014 06:37 — #9
Also reminds me of calls from the US government for Snowden and the various journalists involved to "hand back the stolen documents". I'm not really sure what they expect to happen. Because obviously there is no "handing back" there is only taking further copies and distributing them to new players, even if those new players are part of the establishment.
I also wonder if giving a copy back to the NSA/GCHQ/Oversight committees might not be a bad strategy. "Here's what we hold. Now what are you going to do?". I have to assume Snowden, Greenwald et al, have at least considered this path and decided it would not be effective.
bucaneer at February 1st, 2014 07:06 — #10
You have to admire the creativity of these people; I mean, the original description of the punishment was not exactly written with the possibility of using a laptop as an effigy in mind:
michael_r_smith at February 1st, 2014 07:08 — #11
Doesn't mention angle grinders.
euansmith at February 1st, 2014 08:02 — #13
robulus at February 1st, 2014 08:41 — #14
On the one hand, I am very saddened that this has taken place. On the other hand, BEST HEADLINE EVA.
mr_smooth at February 1st, 2014 08:53 — #15
Well dang, I was curious what was in the documents. Now we'll never know.
boundegar at February 1st, 2014 09:13 — #16
Yes you're wrong. Witches are much much harder to replace.
kmoser at February 1st, 2014 09:15 — #17
I want to see Cameron's reaction when somebody tells him that any script kiddie can analyze the footage of the computer being destroyed and reassemble the data from the images of the dust.
hdb at February 1st, 2014 09:46 — #18
This seems like a watershed moment. The futility of destroying one set of hard drives containing data, in a newspaper office no less. This would be a good starting point for a piece looking at the larger story: the extent to which freedom of speech, journalistic freedom, and privacy have been eroded.
jim_kirk at February 1st, 2014 09:58 — #19
Better call these folks...
Weirdly odd. It's like they're developing the sacraments of a new technology based religion.
space_monkey at February 1st, 2014 10:25 — #20
It's much better to be able to keep on getting them to lie in public, and then reveal the lies as lies one by one.
hotel at February 1st, 2014 10:59 — #21
I don't disagree that there was a hefty intimidation factor here, but consider that:
This makes me wonder if there wasn't some degree of genuine concern about information getting out because of something they knew about that specific machine.
One of the problems with the whole NSA/Snowden story is that it's a lot harder to calibrate your paranoia meter than it used to be…
next page →