$100m gift to the National Park Service is "transformative"

[anothernewbbaccount]

@fiatrn

So even a 1% tax would yield more than this, from ONE company only, in One year only.

@Scientist

we should tax Eli Lilly and other companies enough that the government can give the parks whatever they need.

I look forward to the day when I never see another ‘sponsored by’ or ‘supported by donations from’ PR fluff statement designed to whitewash the reputations of rapacious corporations, and instead I see all their marketing materials saying “Z Corp is a proud taxpayer. Last year we paid $nnnn to the US [insert country of choice] government in taxes, to support the things you and your elected representatives think are important.”