Which means not now. Which means using commodity CO2. Which means…
…is utter bullshit. It will be a carbon contributor until a) the cost of carbon capture and reuse is less than the cost of commodity carbon and b) the capture process itself doesn’t require emitting more carbon than it captures.
“Under more realistic assumptions, energy equivalent to the output of around 500GW of nuclear or 1,200GW of onshore wind would be needed. To put this in perspective, there is 345GW of nuclear and 432GW of wind power capacity around the world today.”
