I entirely agree, and I think part of the reason that these parodies are funny (to me at least) is that there is a grain of truth in them.
As it was the ‘king of the goblins’, is it more relevant that he was a goblin or that he was a king?
I entirely agree, and I think part of the reason that these parodies are funny (to me at least) is that there is a grain of truth in them.
As it was the ‘king of the goblins’, is it more relevant that he was a goblin or that he was a king?