This article is just The Flight of Dragons all over again.
What is with articles like this, lately? I’ve seen a number of them where the authors just borrow the old arguments of others without any attribution of the idea whatsoever.
This article is just The Flight of Dragons all over again.
What is with articles like this, lately? I’ve seen a number of them where the authors just borrow the old arguments of others without any attribution of the idea whatsoever.
