Most of your examples are the press. I’ll refer to the amendment:
The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed. The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable. The people shall not be restrained from peaceably assembling and consulting for their common good; nor from applying to the Legislature by petitions, or remonstrances, for redress of their grievances.
They don’t really need the freedom of expression provision. (And if they had the freedom of expression provision they wouldn’t need the freedom of the press provision, but the authors included it, which goes to my point)
And yes, Planned Parenthood, as a corporation, would not have freedom of expression or of religion under my proposal.
Again, what law are you worried that the government will pass? Because that’s how freedoms work, they are used to overturn bad laws. Without a law to examine you can’t just throw out the idea that something is “first amendment protected”. Anything may be protected in one case and not in another, depending on the specific law. After all, none of the examples you’ve given would be protected from copyright law if they violated it.
