Animal rights activist breaks his 365-day vow of silence on TV

What I find really sad is that you completely ignored the most important part of this activist’s statement:

“If we don’t need to kill and eat animals to be healthy, what are we doing this for?”

Instead, you chose to focus on the way he spoke, the way he protested. It’s almost like a defence mechanism you use not to feel shitty about paying someone to enslave and slaughter animals just because you like eating them.

Because when you put it like that - eating animals is definitely a shitty thing to do, and most people do it, and it’s hard to deal with once you realise it.

So it’s much easier to focus on how James babbles on about “wise Indian man” and how he uses “Big league violence”.

I’m sympathetic to his ideas, but I find him so hard to suffer that he doesn’t seem to be helping his cause much

Alright, what are YOU doing to help animals then?

2 Likes