Appeals court rules brief "Vogue" horn sample was not copyright infringement

IDK, he worked with Nile Rodgers but did he really try to co-opt into movements without collaborating?

And donā€™t release a video saying you were attempting to recreate / ā€œreimagineā€ (or whatever Pharell calls it) the specific song.

I think 0.25 seconds should just have been declared fair use. Maybe there is a desire to avoid a numerical definition?

Iā€™m trying to imagine a 0.25s sample that would confuse the market or unfairly drain sales from the originalā€¦

ā€¦all I can come up with is a series of 960 consecutive 0.25s samples comprising your entire composition - that seems unfair

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.