And don’t release a video saying you were attempting to recreate / “reimagine” (or whatever Pharell calls it) the specific song.
I think 0.25 seconds should just have been declared fair use. Maybe there is a desire to avoid a numerical definition?
I’m trying to imagine a 0.25s sample that would confuse the market or unfairly drain sales from the original…
…all I can come up with is a series of 960 consecutive 0.25s samples comprising your entire composition - that seems unfair
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
