Look, if that makes you feel better to ascribe beliefs to me, knock yourself out.
Of course evidence can support a hypothesis, the point is whether you’re asking a question that has any scientific meaning to our actual understanding of reality.
While just about any hypothesis may be true, as possible as the Eiffel Tower, as possible as an invisible Unicorn no one can detect, this one has no truly testable property and ultimately no predictive power, and it’s defined to be that way. So it is a great philosophy question, an interesting exercise, but there’s nothing there beyond that.