No, no I’m not. I’m pointing out that you’re reading a lot into this guy, and to me. Have you . . .read half of what you reply to?
Nor will I. I have no need to back up your misinterpretation. What I have backed up is my actual argument, which is apparently not what you’re responding to.
And I stigmatize people? I do not think that word means what you think it means.
And I have a ‘guilt by association’ web? Where? How did you know when I do not? You don’t even know ME and clearly aren’t trying too hard to understand where I’m coming from. Communication is two-way street, is it not?
I say a thing, you say ‘NO!’, I clarify, you say ‘Prove it!’, I link a couple of sources and explain further, you say TL;DR. You somehow have allegedly read the posts you’re responding to, but you’re still attacking straw men rather than talk to me.
Give me something to be wrong about, I’d LOVE that! That’s the best thing ever,that’s how I grow! But it has to be a real thing. Surely you’re up to the challenge? Can you also embrace your own flaws as gleefully as I do? That speeds things up!
Want to get back to the point? How Ariel Castro is definitely best off not being anywhere he can do harm, but we’re poisoning ourselves by turning him into a cartoon villain, and our media has already screwed up the lives of every actual person involved, especially those who’d like to be known by their names, instead of by their association with a veritable comic book character.
