Virginia Hughes says her criticism of the study: that it has faulty assumptions and flawed methodology. She unfortunately doesn’t elaborate, just goes on to her main point, which is about how common such problems are. But to claim that wasn’t honest and her real problem must be that she doesn’t like the results…
…well, that’s an uncharitable conjecture, stated as fact with nothing given to back it up. So by those same standards, I get to conjecture why you might deny what she said; and for ackpht there’s a comment history that sure makes it look like the reason is he didn’t like the result.
Funny, that.
