I understand the process, as do you, however, the vast majority of busy people out there do not and are working on the smallest amounts of political information (as opposed to political messaging, in which we are drowning).
To conflate the count of constituent selected (past tense) delegates on THE. SAME. FUCKING. CHART. as pledged-but-yet-to-be-cast-may-change-in-the-future (future infinitive) superdelegates is to confuse. It gives the impression a vote for Sanders would be a vote launched into the wind. It’s a subtle form of voter suppression. That’s the issue I’ve had all along (since this sort of combined “count” chart started appearing in Q1 2016).
I’ve said no such thing, but thanks for the projection
