The exhibit is primarily about the activity, not the names. Unless you can cite something that he DID which is relevant to cybersecurity, then for the purposes of this presentation he’s one more obscure name among many obscure names.
If the exhibit was about the history of public interaction with cybersecurity he might merit mention.
If the exhibit was about the history of organizational feuds, or manpower management, he might merit mention.
As it is, I really can’t disagree with them.
