It’s skirting the edges. They’re paying people to have a voting plan (legal) and also to publically disparage – but not vote against – one of the candidates (also legal). Put together, they might still be legal because technically one can still vote for a non-duopoly candidate. Where they might get in trouble is the “blue-leaning” phrase, but we’ll see.
As for me, I’m all for it. I also like the point they make about the dyfunctional system by only offering two bucks and change if you live in a non-swing state.
