If you read my post you’d notice I linked to that same Argo site, which gives a value of 0.06°C. You quoted the more precise value of 0.065 °C, which apparently comes from the blogs I mentioned and not your link. So now you are not just ignoring what you were answering - that total energy matters to surface temperatures - but seemingly trying to conceal your actual sources. Classy.
Edit: I’d also like to point out that same NOAA site mentions salinity changes suggesting a several percent change to the hydrological cycle, driven by those same surface temperatures. Yet somehow you only thought to consider the bulk oceanic temperature, even after we mentioned the surface is why the energy change matters?
