Right: you don’t care about the facts – the implications of which you obviously aren’t qualified to discuss; you want to know what popular dogma I must have subscribed to to dare to impose an inconvenient fact on this theological debate.
I don’t read climate blogs, or “climate skeptic” blogs. IAmA physicist by training and read physics blogs, one of which had an analysis of this data a few days ago, and originated that number.
Edit: it was this one (I’m not going to fish out the article – you’ll have to scroll)
