Look: 99% of voters favor democracy over anarchy, and 99.9% of Creation Scientists believe in the literal existence of Adam and Eve. Oh, and most water is wet.
Comparing climate scientists to creationists (who aren’t scientists, for one thing) is stunningly ludicrous, insulting to said real scientists and a novice mistake for someone like you who claims to be speaking from authority.
For the record: I don’t deny anthropogenic global warming.
Bully for you. But, I imagine you’re also a libertarian, climate change impact denier, amirite? Be honest.
IAmA physicist by training and read physics blogs
So, you’re not a climate scientist who is an expert in climate science. Not that it matters, right? Let’s leave climate science up to creationist “scientists” or whomever deems themselves an expert in climate science without them going through the actual rigors of being an actual climate scientist. Screw it.
If you’re so interested in climate science, why not become an actual climate scientist? Or is this just a hobby of yours that somehow qualifies you to be an expert who trumps seasoned climate scientists? Did other hobbyists who trump experts in their field peer review your hobby studies you haven’t presented?
Maybe it’s time you consulted with 97% of the world’s climate scientists? Ya know, experts in their field? Nevermind, that’s ludicrous… consensus of climate scientists on climate science means as little as creationism in your batty world.
the implications of which you obviously aren’t qualified to discuss;
The irony of you saying that to @chenille escapes you, doesn’t it? You’re the one who needn’t be a climate scientist to dismiss consensus of 97% of all climate scientists as trivial along with comparing them to creationists. What exactly are your qualifications again? You’ve read some blogs?
