I get that. It’s not good that this is allowed, it’s not good that this is possible. But given the circumstances maybe you need to. Provided it is the across the board push to flip the government away from Trump and his enablers that it’s claimed it will be. Practically, some one with the means stepping up to do that could be good.
But Bloomberg’s run complicates that assumption. He’s explicitly running for a particular political faction and explicitly because progressives can’t be allowed to be nominated. Either cause they’re bad, or because they obviously can’t win. Depending on what day it is.
And his focus is pretty narrowly anti-Trump, he isn’t really connecting it to the Republicans. Trump isn’t the problem, Trump is the end result and you won’t be undoing this damage so long as the folks rubber stamping his shit remain in control.
I’d prefer not to celebrate good things, till we know they’re good.
Let’s say he succeeds in denying Trump re-election. But the approach gives the GOP control of congress. That doesn’t fix anything, and practically cuts the nuts out of attempts to do so. And I get the feeling that would be fine with Bloomberg.
