Literally missing the point by a mile. This woman has a family living under an oppressive regime and is paid to read words she is given in a costume on TV, but you are filling in the blanks to fit your argument without any proof whatsoever outside of your experience with similar appearing characters in the media you know. If you have some level of evidence to your argument that she is a fan of the regime, chose the career path for something beyond earning money for her family, or whatever else then you would have shown it.
And that’s another point, you are responsible for providing evidence to prove your point. It’s not my responsibility to provide evidence against your own flimsy argument. I don’t need to prove she isn’t drinking alcohol or details of her life that changes your mind, because you are the one making the argument she is drinking alcohol and that her life is the way you are presenting it. The burden of proof is on you, and plausible deniability should be upheld outside of that proof.
This is just garbage logic from the first line through the last. I could pick it apart, but I doubt you care.
