Court case seeks to clarify that photographers don't need permission to publish pictures that incidentally capture public works of art

[ClutchLinkey]

@johnnyFresh

A big company can apply artwork to their building, purchase the copyright or have the artwork produced by an employee and then using copyright law to censor pictures of their office and the public street it is on.

I think there would still be cases for fair use of images or video including incidental capture of their corporate art. I’m not a lawyer, but did some research on copyright recently and was pretty surprised how much we can do under fair use.
For now…