that’s a very corporate side stepping of the issue. they say the problem was his statement about the “critical reception” but what part do they mean? it’s intentionally vague
if they’d wanted to stand up for progressive ideals and, say, declare themselves as anti-racist, they could have. they could have touted their own diversity ( if they have a diverse staff ), or the desire to elevate non cis white conservative male voices. and they didn’t
i do agree that a game typically is more than just one person, and there might have been other creative voices in the mix. a sequel might jettison his baggage though the statement makes it seem unlikely. time will tell i guess
