Which version of the Geneva Convention are you reading? Those are specifically referencing the 4th. Articles 17-19 deal with humanitarian rights that were suppressed via direct orders from Rumsfeld. Sorry you stopped at the second one because you didn’t personally see or understand the application. That list are the articles specifically listed by the conglomeration of legal teams in the potential case that was put together but never tried.
If by “bullshity” you mean that “numerous well respected legal teams agree upon”, 23 respected law firms cooperated in putting the potential case together, then yeah…what would they know compared to you? lol. geeze. this isn’t my information btw., I was merely passing it along assuming that you actually wanted the answer to your question. ha! guess not.
Apparently since you couldn’t be bothered to read past the second one you weren’t actually interested in the answer but rather in expressing your pre-arrived at viewpoint. fair enough. carry on with your opinions… if you want them to be informed opinions you may wish to dig into the material a little deeper though…
