But note in your first post here, you don’t present the strange consequences of electrostatic fields as a possibility for open minds to consider. You present them as a decided fact somehow ignored by our terrible science reporting despite its great consequences.
This is why it’s very difficult to take your ideas about dogmatism in peer review and how to fix them seriously. There are some real problems with it, but when it comes to overturning well-supported ideas and accepting new ones you don’t seem to care for any standard of evidence beyond “well, some guys say they found something.”
