I was morbidly curious to see what the folks at National Review thought about this new “proposal.” They’ve got an article up explaining why it’s bad, but not for any reason regarding the sanctity of human life or whatever. They’re upset because they see this as an expensive expansion of Obamacare, only being even more liberal than any of the benefits that were originally covered under the Affordable Care Act. In their words they think this proposal was “too liberal for Obama” because it would be overly generous and pass on too much cost to other insurance payers who don’t need fertility treatments. Those pundits are truly deplorable people, but I guess we all knew that.
12 Likes
