You seem to be obsessing about a broken condom being the sum total of the case against Assange even though both links make it clear that it is more than just that, no matter what spin people put on it. At the end of the day, he has multiple things for which he is wanted for questioning.
[Quote]The warrant was appealed to the Svea Court of Appeal which upheld it but lowered it to suspicion of rape of a lesser degree, unlawful coercion and two cases of sexual molestation rather than three,[19][20] and the warrant was also appealed to the Supreme Court of Sweden,[21] which decided not to hear the case. [/Quote]
This isn’t simple “a condom broke and two women got mad.”
As to his falsehoods, I really don’t have a time to make a list. Either he, wikileaks, or their sources have edited the data in the dumps. You can find many links to that.
Whatever he’s doing, it seems to be serving Russian interests and his high ground, personally and as the organization, seems pretty nonexistent.
