I’ll admit I was wrong, I’m not sure when I got messed up there. It does recollect my opinion quite a bit, but it still leaves us knowing nothing about the details of the case. I trust that if anything that could be pursued to trial would have - or at least something that could have been used to take Clinton out of the race fairly and without aparant bias. Too many with too much power can effect that decision either way.
For example, what if a State employee received an email with classified information from another department and it ends up on the server? Clinton doesn’t know it is on a server she owns, the one that sent the message didn’t know they broke a rule, etc. This falls into the reckless behavior category without being something you could bring to trial. Even if the letter of the law says the other department shouldn’t have sent it, the State employee should have cleaned it properly, and HRC shouldn’t have enabled the issue - can you build a case against any of them?
