If your doctor’s going to help you interpret it, and sanity-check it, I have no problem with that. If they want to continue marketing retail, they need to play by the rules… and since (we presume) they’re legit, they really shouldn’t have any trouble doing so.
They tried to take a short cut. It failed. Now they get to go back and do it the way they should have when the FDA first told them the short cut wasn’t acceptable. I’m sorry, I don’t see that as an undue hardship or restraint of trade; it’s simply a cost of doing business in this country.
