The post seems to be trying to dodge around making concrete claims:
They cite “testimonials” and “possibilities” but the headline has no such coyness. So BB might want to update the headline and post with the Quack Miranda Warning that CBD isn’t evaluated or approved by the FDA to treat pain or anxiety. (But I’m not sure that will suffice since this is neither a food supplement nor a homeopathic remedy - both of which get wide (and often undeserved) leeway from the FDA. The post specifically calls the product a “medication.”)
Here’s a news report on the FDA and FTC joint action on CBD claims:
Oh, and “check your state laws regarding CBD before you buy” should include the converse “check your state laws regarding CBD before you sell”. Just ask Tommy Chong about the problems with selling over state lines.
