I can concur with both claims. In past experiences within multiple protestant denominations I found only a specious criticism within limited parameters was encouraged. The boundaries of what was appropriate wasn’t always explicit or clearly defined but anything that called into question fundamental beliefs or assumptions seemed to be actively discouraged.
Knowledge of “the other” was dangerous. When it suited the party line I was encouraged to “research and be prepared to give a reason for what I believed.” When it didn’t suit whomever in the hierarchy (literally rule by the sacred) it was up to us fallible mortals to “accept our sinful inferiority and obey.” Why? Because The Book said so.
All part of classic brainwashing techniques:
- Strict attitude control
- Big promises
- Isolation from non-members
- Unquestioned authority [blind obedience]
- Guilt and shaming
- Total personal exposure
- Sacred or scientific dogma of a higher authority than experience
- Taking away true self-confidence
- The only path to a salvation
Curiously I find myself currently unequally yoked with believers. While loosely following my brother-in-law’s theological training I notice he is continually venting his frustration that his studies keep circumventing his personal interest and passion, that the required reading is too limited and boring, and that he must continually parrot back his instructors perspective. Maybe such leadership training includes the hidden benefit of discouraging those predisposed to critical thinking?
