The funniest part about the denial and obviously web sites trying to curry favour or colluding at executive level. The authenticity of historical output autocomplete feature was question with regard to political bias and google response was to go to new, not historical output, to prove that the autocomplete feature that it controls does not because, I mean come on seriously guy, they can program that auto complete to produce what ever they want, the letter don’t even have to match, you could type in 123 and it could be programmed to come back with with Eric Schmidt is God, they can program it to do what ever they wanted it to do, NOW.
They should know it is a stupid and illogical defence and their use of it, tends to provide proof that they are corrupt in it’s use, they did not step back and consider if people are question that source we simply can not go to that source and provide ‘NEW’ results and claim that as proof of what occurred in the past.