This helps to reveal the disingenuous declaration “No tear gas was used.” for the pure equivocation it is.
I want to see the next administration official who declares “It wasn’t tear gas” raked over the coals about exactly which compound it was, why they take such pains to exclude it from their private definition of “tear gas”, and if they would be willing to participate in research (in one of the NON control groups) as to the long term effects of the various riot control agents so dear to US LEOs
