Oh, you’re cute. We both know I’ve never attacked you in any way or used strawman arguments. My original post was quite polite. The worst I said was “that’s insulting”.
You might not have mentioned my gender, but I mentioned it (my own), so why couldn’t I use it to refer to myself? And being “precise with how [you] term things” doesn’t really make a difference when you say direct accusations such as “IF you want to make the argument that games shouldn’t be violent, brash or sexy, then make it and come out and say you want to see games like that banned, because that’s what you’re proposing.” or “and because it’s guys, you see that as a bad thing.” I’m arguing with lines like that, exactly what you said - I don’t need to assume anything.
You implied that I want to change or ban all the brass, sexy, violent “man games”, or that I think all men are assholes, none of which I did. You tried to paint a completely different picture of me based on what you assumed and not what I said. I never implied anything about your intentions. If you can’t see anything wrong with what you’ve said, it’s a lost cause.
(Edited to make my message clearer)
