It was poor journalism. That’s why they posted an editor’s note retracting the section of the article dealing with PropOrNot. That’s what a paper’s supposed to do when they use a bad source, and that’s what they did.
It was poor journalism. That’s why they posted an editor’s note retracting the section of the article dealing with PropOrNot. That’s what a paper’s supposed to do when they use a bad source, and that’s what they did.
