Au contraire, mon frere…
Someone who was there finally stepped forward to confirm long-held suspicions.
Iran Contra happened well after the election (from 81-86) and had nothing to do with Carter.
It’s more like it was a continuation of their original deal to release the hostages; HSR said he was going to continue the arms embargo against Iran that Carter started.
He was, of course, lying.
It was selling arms to Iran in order to fund the contra’s war against the left-wing government, since Congress had not authorized funding for supporting the contras.
I am well aware of those attempts to circumvent the Boland Amendment, and watched the hearings that followed. Ollie North should’ve ended his days in Leavenworth…
A further clarification - there were hostages involved, but it was those being held by Hezbollah, not the hostages in Tehran.
Sure, there were hostages being held in Lebanon; that was the official explanation to justify the arms shipments and was entirely separate from the earlier swap.
Americans were still unhappy with Iran at the time and this added to the scandal.