“Science always deals (with) the problem. The truth wins.”
Really?
I can think of some vexing problems that science has not dealt with, how does one assert that this is a strictly temporary condition?
I think that statement is a variation on the appeal to novelty. If newer is better, and science is newest, then science must win.
Chronological snobbery is not an argument, its a bias you assume your readership must share.
