I can’t say I’m surprised; but I’d be interested to know what the justification someone who thinks that the childless are so disconnected from the future that they need more taxation and less representation in the context of the administration of the state would give for choosing the religion that has(with the occasional formalized exception, like certain conversion instances, and a number of…less formalized…ones) reserved all clerical, command, and the substantial bulk of theological and educational roles specifically to such people for the better part of a millennium.
I’m sure it’s different somehow, because reasons; but it seems more than a trifle incongruous.
