John Gilmore explains why spying for "the right reasons" is still wrong

PhasmaFelis September 20, 2013, 7:00am 18

Sorry, I meant to say Roger Barkan, the NSA mathematician whose article Gilmore was responding to. I’ve edited my original post to reflect that, and make it clearer which article I was talking about.

Topic		Replies	Views
NSA authorized Australian wiretapping of US law firms in trade-dispute boing	17	2653	February 21, 2014
If you're a CIA employee it's ok to torture people, but talk to a reporter? Go to jail boing	12	1599	February 1, 2015
NSA agents may have infiltrated the global communications industry boing	10	2082	October 17, 2014
Barrett Brown’s sentence is unjust, but it may become the norm for journalists boing	66	4336	January 31, 2015
NSA reveals that it illegally gathered thousands of phone records, to the appalled astonishment of FISA court judge boing	70	4343	September 16, 2013

John Gilmore explains why spying for "the right reasons" is still wrong

Related topics