There was nothing noble or humanitarian in their cause. I see them as emboldened thieves, yet they were allowed to occupy and damage government property for a decent amount of time unmolested, with one exception, only to be aquitted.
Is the reinforcement of a privaleged groups’ exemption from police brutality and the legal system actually resistance? I don’t think so.
Of course individual protests aren’t meant to address all issues. But when one group is freerer to further it’s own causes, systemic racism continues to be reinforced and normalized.
And here is the crux of our disagreement. You’re attributing the restraint of authorities to the militia’s guns. I don’t believe the guns were soley responsible, or that things would have played out this way with different protestors.