You are as entitled to your opinion about what constitutes “ethical” hunting behaviour as I am entitled to mine. But they are just opinions, no more. I stated my opinion, you stated yours, but your opinion is in no sense a response to mine; it’s just different without some framework of ethics on which we could agree. And I suspect we couldn’t.
I assumed that anyone who has a view of ethics will know the tag from Terentius, since it’s pretty important in that field.
