I know, right? @mister44 has not appeared once in this thread.
I think thatâs the overriding reason for the company policy. That and strict export controls regulations. Also, IIRC in some countries itâs illegal to bring your computer if itâs encrypted.
They havenât demanded any passwords to guns yet.
Those Tracking Point rifles run Linux.
I have repeatedly been against unlawful searches, seizures of cash and property on suspicion itâs drug related, etc. I have constantly denounced the do-nothing security theater of the TSA, and the DHS is a redundant waste of money that should fall under the FBI and Boarder Patrol/Customs that we already had.
If there is one thing I try to be, it is consistent in my attitude of freedom for all and the basic legal concept this nation was founded on - innocent until proven guilty.
When I poked my head in on this thread, no one was making statements like, âThe government should have access to his laptop. What if he was terrorist or a hacker or a child pornographer? Only those doing something wrong have something to hide. The UK has much more surveillance than the US, and look at how much safer they are.â Had I heard that, I would have made a counter statement.
But if you insist: I parrot all the outrage. It is ridiculous private property of US citizen was seized at the border with no warrant, no charge of a crime, just (apparently) random net casting for - who knows what. Maybe they were worried someone in China put malware on his laptop. Or maybe Bobâs daughter needed one for her first year of college. I dunno, but itâs ridiculous.
ETA - if you donât think there are a lot of libertarian minded gun owners who are against 4th amendment violations, or conservative gun owners who see 4th amendment violations as Obamaâs government over stepping itâs authority, you would be mistaken.
You are Rand Paul, and I claim my five pounds.
I donât know what that last part means. Should I like it or not?
When libertarians begin giving anything more than lip service to actual issues of civil or economic liberty rather than attempting to foment race wars or getting their tongues so far up their bossâ ass that they think they can see things through the eyes of a billionaire, we can have a discussion. But only then.
Instead of repeating talking points cribbed from Rockwell, consider supporting the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, open source software, and non-exclusive licensing of patents. Things that would be termed libertarian if the taste werenât so excreable.
This has been happening to years. It has happened to friends of mine more than once (the same friends more than once) within the security community where I work. A number of people, including myself, donât travel over a border with any data though it is hard not to bring your phone. You might as well toss it when they give it back (if they do) though.
Hell, Jake Appelbaum had either three or four phones seized the first time they did this to him and they never returned any of them, years later.
Yeah and they hold you until you change your mind. Unless you have counsel handy and they let you call said counsel, youâre at a border crossing and donât have any effective rights.
Work is easy. With work (and work laptops), you invoke âThis isnât my property/system to give you permissions to. Youâll need to loop in corporate legal and Iâll do whatever they tell me to do with their system.â
This isnât the gun thread. Weâre already full up on crazy on that one, please donât import it from the gun thread.
BTW, these policies started under Bush so this isnât where you invoke âObama!â to explain things or are you saying your gun nut Libertarian friends were ok when Bush was doing this?
I donât know the origin of the quote, but Iâll paraphrase my thoughts on the whole âsecurityâ situation:
âPeople should not be beholden to their governments, governments should be beholden to their peopleâ
Still a bit confused, but how much is that in Shekels?
Whoa, whoa, what? I assume this is Koch jab? The term libertarian has a very broad meaning. More so then liberal and conservative. There are people who claim to be libertarians who are way radical - taxation is theft sort of stuff.
But there are a lot of moderates who just want less government, and more personal freedoms. They are the last people âattempting to foment race warsâ.
There are some open to more social programs than others. You canât find two libertarians that agree on everything. It sounds to me you want to pigeon hole the term as one particular stereotype, and that isnât accurate. I know many libertarian types who support all or most of the 4 orgs you mentioned.
I was literally called out on it, which is the only reason I brought it up. It was the only reason I posted.
It doesnât matter who started it. It is who is in power. That is how punditry works. And yes, liberals are more likely to excuse Obamaâs actions they would have crucified Bush for, and vice versa. It doesnât have to make sense, itâs politics.
Yes, I know, you are the true Scotsman and you know many other Scotsmen; you have binders full if them. If I believed you, we might talk.
So youâre saying everyone who identifies as a libertarian is a Koch toady and probably a racist?
Iâm tired of the gun crap coming up over and over, too. I joked upthread out of tiredness, but I shouldnât even bring it up. We need to leave the guns at the door and talk about other stuff. INSANE GUN DEBATES ARE GETTING OLD. Letâs have a cease-fire on fucking gun debates for, say, a month. We can talk about them again sometime in November.
What dâyall say?
@mods?
Iâm game. Iâll be more productive at work.
ETA - and to point out - I didnât bring it up. Someone else said âwhy donât gun rights people get upset about thisâ and then specifically called me out on my silence.
OK, great. Iâll joke about other stuff.